000			02844cam a22003852u 4500
001			5264932
003			BD-DhUL
005			20161120122720.0
007			he u||024||||
008			080220s1974 xxu ||| bt ||| | eng d
037			_aED100920 _bERIC
040			_aericd _beng _cericd _dMvI _dBD-DhUL
091			_amfm
100	1		_aHosford, Phil.
245	1	0	_aCan the X-Factor of Teaching Be Used In Research / _h[microform] / _cPhil Hosford and Angela Schroder.
260			_a[Washington, D.C.] : _bDistributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, _c1995.
300			_a7 p.
520			_aFor years, an intuitively perceived X-factor seemed to help principals, professors, and supervisors announce with confidence those who were "really good teachers." This study attempted to point the way to gathering data objectively with regard to the X-factor. Two specific objectives were sought. The first one was to determine to what degree the following groups of people, involved with teachers in different capacities and roles, may be in agreement on the stronger/weaker "teachers" viewed: (a) selected 9th-grade students, (b) a 9th-grade class, (c) a senior high school class, (d) masters-level students in a graduate education course, (e) full-time teachers in a graduate education course, and (f) doctoral students and professors in education. A second objective was to determine if the evaluation of prospective teachers made by the group of five 9th-graders would correlate at a high level with the other groups and be reliable enough to serve as sufficient and representative in the evaluation process of prospective teachers. All six groups evaluated the videotaped performance of sophomores involved in a microteaching assignment. The results of the collected data showed significant correlations between evaluations made by five 9th-grade students and by students in both a 9th-grade class and a senior high school class from different schools within the same district. Low correlations were found between evaluations by the five 9th-graders and graduate students, public school teachers and professors. (JA)
533			_aMicrofiche. _b[Washington D.C.]: _cERIC Clearinghouse _emicrofiches : positive.
650	0	7	_aAdministrator Attitudes. _2ericd
650	1	7	_aEvaluation. _2ericd
650	0	7	_aEvaluation Methods. _2ericd
650	0	7	_aOpinions. _2ericd
650	0	7	_aStudent Attitudes. _2ericd
650	1	7	_aStudent Teachers. _2ericd
650	0	7	_aSupervisors. _2ericd
650	0	7	_aTeacher Attitudes. _2ericd
650	1	7	_aTeacher Interns. _2ericd
650	0	7	_aVideotape Recordings. _2ericd
655		7	_aReports, Research. _2ericd
700	1		_aSchroder, Angela, _eauthor.
856	4	1	_uhttp://www.eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED100920
942			_2ddc _cBK
984			_aANL _cmc 2253 ED100920 _d77000000100021
999			_c125891 _d125891