000 | 02043nam a22003258a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | CR9781139795388 | ||
003 | UkCbUP | ||
005 | 20170413094206.0 | ||
006 | m|||||o||d|||||||| | ||
007 | cr|||||||||||| | ||
008 | 120928s2013||||enk s ||1 0|eng|d | ||
020 | _a9781139795388 (ebook) | ||
020 | _z9781107037854 (hardback) | ||
040 |
_aUkCbUP _cUkCbUP _erda |
||
050 | 0 | 0 |
_aB2743 _b.J36 2013 |
082 | 0 | 0 |
_a193 _223 |
100 | 1 |
_aJames, David, _eauthor. |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aRousseau and German Idealism : _bFreedom, Dependence and Necessity / _cDavid James. |
246 | 3 | _aRousseau & German Idealism | |
264 | 1 |
_aCambridge : _bCambridge University Press, _c2013. |
|
300 |
_a1 online resource (243 pages) : _bdigital, PDF file(s). |
||
336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
500 | _aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 09 Oct 2015). | ||
520 | _aThe claim that Rousseau's writings influenced the development of Kant's critical philosophy, and German idealism, is not a new one. As correct as the claim may be, it does not amount to a systematic account of Rousseau's place within this philosophical tradition. It also suggests a progression whereby Rousseau's achievements are eventually eclipsed by those of Kant, Fichte and Hegel, especially with respect to the idea of freedom. In this book David James shows that Rousseau presents certain challenges that Kant and the idealists Fichte and Hegel could not fully meet, by making dependence and necessity, as well as freedom, his central concerns, and thereby raises the question of whether freedom in all its forms is genuinely possible in a condition of human interdependence marked by material inequality. His study will be valuable for all those studying Kant, German idealism and the history of eighteenth- and nineteenth-century ideas. | ||
650 | 0 | _aIdealism, German | |
776 | 0 | 8 |
_iPrint version: _z9781107037854 |
856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139795388 |
999 |
_c179140 _d179140 |