000			02097nam a22003258a 4500
001			CR9780511676420
003			UkCbUP
005			20180107143412.0
006			m|||||o||d||||||||
007			cr||||||||||||
008			100212s2010||||enk s ||1 0|eng|d
020			_a9780511676420 (ebook)
020			_z9780521767149 (hardback)
040			_aUkCbUP _cUkCbUP _erda
082	0	0	_a343.240721 _222
100	1		_aLovdahl Gormsen, Liza, _eauthor.
245	1	2	_aA Principled Approach to Abuse of Dominance in European Competition Law / [electronic resource] _cLiza Lovdahl Gormsen.
264		1	_aCambridge : _bCambridge University Press, _c2010.
300			_a1 online resource (226 pages) : _bdigital, PDF file(s).
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
490	0		_aAntitrust and Competition Law
500			_aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 09 Oct 2015).
520			_aThree questions surround the interpretation and application of Article 82 of the EC Treaty. What is its underlying purpose? Is it necessary to demonstrate actual or likely anticompetitive effects on the market place when applying Article 82? And how can dominant undertakings defend themselves against a finding of abuse? Instead of the usual discussion of objectives, Liza Lovdahl Gormsen questions whether the Commission's chosen objective of consumer welfare is legitimate. While many Community lawyers would readily accept and indeed welcome the objective of consumer welfare, this is not supported by case law. The Community Courts do not always favour consumer welfare at the expense of economic freedom. This is important for dominant undertakings' ability to advance efficiencies and for understanding why the Chicago and post-Chicago School arguments cannot be injected into Article 82.
650		0	_aEuropean Economic Community
776	0	8	_iPrint version: _z9780521767149
830		0	_aAntitrust and Competition Law.
856	4	0	_uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511676420 _zCambridge Books Online
999			_c236494 _d236494