000 | 01929cam a2200301 a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 9447130 | ||
003 | BD-DhUL | ||
005 | 20190905121741.0 | ||
006 | m d | ||
007 | cr n | ||
008 | 110322s2011 enk sb 001 0 eng d | ||
020 | _a9780521197601 (hbk.) | ||
035 | _a(WaSeSS)ssj0000535803 | ||
040 |
_aDLC _cDLC _dYDXCP _dBWK _dC#P _dUKMGB _dRCJ _dCDX _dMIX _dDLC _dBD-DhUL |
||
050 | 4 |
_aK3240 _b.D39 2011 |
|
082 | 0 | 0 |
_a344.7305 _222 _bLOD |
084 |
_aPOL035010 _2bisacsh |
||
100 | 1 | _aLondras, Fiona De | |
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aDetention in the 'War on Terror' : _bcan human rights fight back? / _cFiona de Londras. |
260 |
_aCambridge : _bCambridge University Press, _c2011. |
||
300 |
_a316 p. : _bill. ; _c24 cm. |
||
365 |
_aUSD _b89.10 |
||
504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references and index. | ||
506 | _aLicense restrictions may limit access. | ||
520 |
_a"Fiona de Londras presents an overview of counter-terrorist detention in the US and the UK and the attempts by both states to achieve a downward recalibration of international human rights standards as they apply in an emergency. Arguing that the design and implementation of this policy has been greatly influenced by both popular and manufactured panic, Detention in the 'War on Terror' addresses counter-terrorist detention through an original analytic framework. In contrast to domestic law in the US and UK, de Londras argues that international human rights law has generally resisted the challenge to the right to be free from arbitrary detention, largely because of its relative insulation from counter-terrorist panic. She argues that this resilience gradually emboldened superior courts in the US and UK to resist repressive detention laws and policies and insist upon greater rights-protection for suspected terrorists"-- _cProvided by publisher. |
||
650 | 0 |
_aHuman rights _xInternational cooperation. |
|
942 |
_2ddc _cBK |
||
999 |
_c73371 _d73371 |