000			03900nam a22005892u 4500
001			5583273
003			BD-DhUL
005			20160616160803.0
007			he u||024||||
008			080220s1994 xxu ||| b ||| ||eng d
020			_a9781878380616 : _c$18.00
020			_a1878380613 : _c$18.00
022			_a0884-0040
037			_aED383279 _bERIC
040			_aericd _beng _cericd _dMvI _dBD-DhUL
082			_a378 _bGAM
091			_amfm
100	1		_aGaither, Gerald.
245	1	0	_aMeasuring Up : _bThe Promises and Pitfalls of Performance Indicators in Higher Education. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 5 / _cGerald Gaither and Others.
260			_aWashington, DC : _bERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education, _c1994.
300			_a159 p. : _c23 cm.
500			_aAvailability: ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education, One Dupont Circle, N.W., Suite 630, Washington, DC 20036-1183 ($18 plus $3.75 postage). _5ericd
500			_aSponsoring Agency: Office of Educational Research and Improvement (ED), Washington, DC. _5ericd
500			_aContract Number: RR93002008. _5ericd
500			_aERIC Note: For a digest of this report, see HE 028 391. _5ericd
520			_aThis report examines the development and implementation of performance indicators in higher education, focusing on the factors driving increased demand for accountability in higher education and the use of performance indicators in the United States and other countries. It discusses the public and political concern for increased productivity, accountability, and quality assessment at colleges and universities in the United States and other countries, in light of educational retrenchment and budgetary constraints. It then reviews the use of performance indicators and outcomes measures in the United States, focusing on the National Association of College and University Business Officers (NACUBO) benchmarking project, the Peterson's/AGB (Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges) strategic indicators survey, the National Center for Higher Education Management Systems (NCHEMS) indicators of good practice project, and the Education Commission of the States (ECS) project. It then examines the use of performance indicators in Great Britain, Canada, Australia, The Netherlands, Finland, Sweden, and Denmark. The report concludes by discussing possible future trends in the use of performance indicators by governments and institutions to promote productivity, accountability, and quality in higher education. A list of related publications is included. (Contains approximately 500 references.) (MDM)
533			_aMicrofiche. _b[Washington D.C.]: _cERIC Clearinghouse _emicrofiches : positive.
650	0	7	_aAccountability. _2ericd
650	0	7	_aBenchmarking. _2ericd
650	1	7	_aCollege Outcomes Assessment. _2ericd
650	1	7	_aColleges. _2ericd
650	0	7	_aCross Cultural Studies. _2ericd
650	0	7	_aEducational Policy. _2ericd
650	1	7	_aEducational Quality. _2ericd
650	0	7	_aForeign Countries. _2ericd
650	0	7	_aGovernment Role. _2ericd
650	0	7	_aHigher Education. _2ericd
650	1	7	_aInstitutional Evaluation. _2ericd
650	0	7	_aOutcomes of Education. _2ericd
650	1	7	_aPerformance Factors. _2ericd
650	0	7	_aProductivity. _2ericd
650	1	7	_aUniversities. _2ericd
653	1		_aPerformance Indicators
653	0		_aAustralia _aCanada _aDenmark _aFinland _aGreat Britain _aNetherlands _aSweden _aUnited States
655		7	_aERIC Publications. _2ericd
655		7	_aReports, Descriptive. _2ericd
710	2		_aAssociation for the Study of Higher Education.
710	2		_aERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education.
710	2		_aGeorge Washington Univ., Washington, DC. Graduate School of Education and Human Development.
856	4	1	_uhttp://www.eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED383279
942			_2ddc _cBK
999			_c78970 _d78970